Tech Support : support@safience.io

Blog

An Overview Of The DEA’s “Drugs Of Abuse” Report And Its Implications For Child Welfare

By a Biometrica staffer

As part of their mandate to prevent substance abuse, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) periodically puts out a resource guide titled “Drugs of Abuse.” The latest version from 2020 is meant to serve as a “comprehensive guide” to the drugs most commonly used in America today, what their effects are, and the legal consequences of being caught with these drugs.

In recent years, drug use has increasingly plagued the country’s youth population in particular. The DEA says that, in 2018, around 11.7% of Americans over the age of 12 (amounting to roughly 31.9 million) admitted to using an illicit drug in the month before they were surveyed. The young, they say, are particularly vulnerable. Data indicates that nearly half of all young people say they have used an illicit drug by the time they graduate high school. In addition, 8.5% of eighth grades, one-in-five high school sophomores, and nearly a quarter of all seniors say they have used an illicit drug in the month before they were surveyed.

In today’s piece, we take a look at the various drugs covered in the DEA report and their implications for youth.

The legality and punishments for various drugs are determined via the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which was originally enacted in 1970. This is the legislation that divvies drugs into various schedules. The DEA, along with the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are the primary bodies that can make changes to the scheduling of drugs.

The factors considered when debating whether a drug needs to be regulated, decontrolled, or rescheduled include: 

  • Its actual or relative potential for abuse.
  • Scientific evidence of its pharmacological effect, if known.
  • The state of current scientific knowledge regarding the drug or other substance.
  • Its history and current pattern of abuse.
  • The scope, duration, and significance of abuse.
  • What, if any, risk there is to the public health.
  • Its psychic or physiological dependence liability.
  • Whether the substance is an immediate precursor of a substance already controlled.

There are five “schedules” that drugs are divided into under the CSA. The “non-sanctioned use” (i.e., not under legitimate medical guidelines) of any of these substances is legally considered to be drug abuse. Most of the drugs (excepting anabolic steroids) are used to chemically alter a person’s moods, thoughts, and feelings through the central nervous system. Addictive substances like alcohol and tobacco are not controlled by the CSA.

Schedule I is the most strictly regulated category. A label of this kind indicates that the substance has “a high potential for abuse” and is not currently accepted as a medical treatment in the U.S. Drugs in this category include heroin, LSD, and marijuana.

Schedule II drugs share many of the same characteristics as Schedule I drugs, but they do have a “currently accepted medical use in treatment.” The DEA acknowledges that these drugs may also lead to addictions/dependence. Examples of these drugs include narcotics like morphine, hydrocodone, and fentanyl, as well as PCP, cocaine, and methamphetamine.

In general, Schedule III drugs are considered to be less causative of addiction and are accepted as medical treatments, though they still have some potential for creating dependency. This category encompasses anabolic steroids, codeine products with aspirin or acetaminophen, and some barbiturates.

Schedule IV drugs are considered even less lethal than the previous category and include sedatives and anti-anxiety drugs like alprazolam (brands like Xanax), clonazepam (Klonopin), and diazepam. Schedule V drugs are, then, the least dangerous drugs, and have a low potential for inspiring dependency. Cough medicines with codeine fall under this category.

The federal penalties for trafficking drugs vary by the amount a person is caught with and which schedule the drug belongs to. For instance, trafficking cocaine can earn anywhere between 5 years to life for a first offense, depending on the amount found. Also, fines for this can range from $5 million for an individual and $25 million for a non-individual to $10 million and $50 million, respectively — again, depending on the amount.

In addition, the CSA regulates five specific classes of drugs: narcotics, stimulants, depressants, hallucinogens, and anabolic steroids. Regardless of class, the DEA says, “all controlled substances have abuse potential or are immediate precursors to substances with abuse potential.” Drugs in any one class can also vary across schedules. For instance, narcotics/opioids can range from heroin (Schedule I) to fentanyl (Schedule II) to cough syrups with codeine in it (Schedule V).

The term “narcotics” traditionally referred to those substances that relieved pain, but today it tends to cover drugs that are derivatives or synthetic substitutes of opium. They are also referred to as opiates and opioids. This is one of the most abused classes of drugs today, as the nation continues to battle an ongoing epidemic of prescription pill abuse. Narcotics are almost ubiquitous now, and can be found at home or through friends by young people.

Stimulants, in general, “speed up the body’s systems” and can create exhilaration and enhance self-esteem, as well as keep people awake for longer, examples are cocaine and amphetamines. Students at universities, in particular, tend to abuse these drugs.

Depressants are the opposite — they help alleviate anxiety, seizures, and muscle spasms, and can induce sleep. They often induce euphoria and are mixed with other drugs to augment the high. Since these are prescribed for common mental illnesses, teens can easily access them from their family’s medicine cabinet, the internet, or even through legitimate doctors. Some, like GHB and Rohypnol (commonly called the “date-rape drug”) are used to “facilitate sexual assault,” the DEA says, and so can often be found in youth circles.

Hallucinogens “alter human perception and mood.” They are found often in nature, though they are also synthetically produced. As the name implies, they cause hallucinations and can affect one’s perception of time, space, and color. Examples are LSD (colloquially known as “acid”), magic mushrooms, PCP, ketamine, MDMA/ecstasy, and even marijuana.

Young people are more likely to be affected by Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder (HPPD), a rare disorder that can be spurred on by stress and that includes “flashbacks” to certain aspects of the drug experience weeks or months after the hallucinogen was actually taken.  The DEA says the hallucinogens most commonly abused among junior and senior high school students are hallucinogenic mushrooms, LSD, and MDMA.

Anabolic steroids are synthetically produced chemical variants of testosterone (the naturally occurring male hormone) that are used to enhance muscle growth, athletic performance, and physical appearance. It’s rare to overdose on these drugs, but the effects build over time, especially if people start using them at a young age. These can be traded at gyms, athletic competitions, or even at schools and universities through teammates, coaches, and trainers.

The DEA also expresses concerns about “designer drugs” in its report. These drugs “differ slightly” in chemical structure from other controlled drugs, but retain the effects. Examples are “bath salts,” which mimic the effects of MDMA, meth, and cocaine; and K2/Spice, which mimic THC (the main ingredient in marijuana).

Of particular concern when it comes to young people abusing drugs is a category called “inhalants” that are not explicitly regulated by the CSA because their trade has genuine economic/commerce value. These are “invisible, volatile substances found in common household products that produce chemical vapors that are inhaled to induce psychoactive or mind altering effects.” Examples include everyday household substances like typewriter correction fluid, felt-tip markers, spray paints, glue, and cleaning fluids.

The DEA report says that these are often “often among the first drugs that young children use” and are among the few substances that tend to be abused more by younger children than older ones. About one in every five kids admitted to having used an inhalant by the time they reach the eighth grade. This is particularly worrying as repeated use can impair cognitive development, and has been linked to failing grades, chronic school absences, and general apathy. 

Per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 15% of high school students reported having at some point used illicit or injection drugs like inhalants, cocaine, or heroin. This increases the risk of overdoses; HIV/AIDS contraction through improper needle use practices or risky sexual behaviors; mental health illnesses; stalled development; and even run-ins with the law.

You can read the DEA’s full report here.

20,160 People Estimated Dead In Motor Vehicle Crashes In H1 2021 — The Highest It’s Been Since 2006

By a Biometrica staffer

Early estimates of traffic fatalities for the first half of 2021 show that an estimated 20,160 people died due to motor vehicle crashes, according to a report by the U.S. Department of Transport’s (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). That amounts to an increase of 18.4% when compared with the 17,020 fatalities projected for the first half of 2020.

That’s the highest number of fatalities during the first half of the year since the year 2006, and the highest half-year percentage increase in the history of data recorded by the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). The estimated 11,225 fatalities during Q2 2021 represent the highest level for any Q2 since 1990 and the highest quarterly percentage change (23.1%) in FARS data recorded history.

Separately, Biometrica reported last month that, after the Covid-19 pandemic, traffic-related fatalities were the second-highest killer of law enforcement officers (LEOs) who died in the line of duty during the first half of 2021. Of those, 10 were automobile crashes involving a collision with another vehicle or fixed object, five were single-vehicle crashes, 19 were struck-by fatalities while on the side of the road, and four were as a result of motorcycle crashes.

“This is a crisis. More than 20,000 people died on U.S. roads in the first six months of 2021, leaving countless loved ones behind. We cannot and should not accept these fatalities as simply a part of everyday life in America,” United States Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said in a statement on the NHTSA website.

In response, the department is launching its first-ever National Roadway Safety Strategy “to identify action steps for everyone working to save lives on the road.” The strategy is scheduled to bring together work being done across DOT and will put forth a comprehensive set of actions to significantly reduce serious injuries and deaths on the nation’s roadways.

The strategy will recognize that although DOT has an important leadership role to play in addressing this crisis, it will require a concerted and coordinated effort across all levels of government, the private sector, and communities to reverse the current trend. The strategy will be released in January. It will be rooted in the Safe System Approach principles and will identify significant actions the Department will take to help ensure: Safer People, Safer Roads, Safer Vehicles, Safer Speeds, and Post-Crash Care.

Apart from the traffic fatality report, the NHTSA also released behavioral research findings from March 2020 through June 2021, indicating that incidents of speeding and traveling without a seatbelt remained higher than during pre-pandemic times. “The report is sobering. It’s also a reminder of what hundreds of millions of people can do every day, right now, to combat this: Slow down, wear seat belts, drive sober, and avoid distractions behind the wheel. All of us must work together to stop aggressive, dangerous driving and help prevent fatal crashes,” said NHTSA Deputy Administrator Dr. Steven Cliff.  

Even as the DOT prepares the new National Roadway Safety Strategy, the Federal Highway Administration has accelerated two proven programs focused on highway safety.

Firstly, its Focused Approach to Safety Program has notified 15 states and Puerto Rico — who together account for roughly half of nationwide road fatalities — that they will receive technical assistance resources to address the most common types of crashes that result in fatalities (roadway departures, intersection crashes, and pedestrian/bicycle crashes). It also issued nine new Proven Safety Countermeasures, which are road design elements that are proven to make roads safer for all drivers but that are underutilized.

All About The FBI’s Identity History Summary Checks

By a Biometrica staffer

If you are planning to apply for a new job, especially a federal one, or are planning to foster or adopt a child, or are considering other similar new opportunities or decisions in your life, it’s very likely that your prospective employer, a licensing agency, or a local law enforcement agency will run a background check on you. When it comes to roles or decisions that involve spending time with children, in particular, a background check is crucial. There are various kinds of background checks out there. For example, there could be private checks done by prospective employers as a one-time screening before finally onboarding a new employee, or companies that run continuous criminal background screenings.

But to prepare yourself for an eventual background check, and preempt any surprises, you can submit a request to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for access to your own criminal history record for a fee. That record, known as the Identity History Summary Check (IHSC), is even mandated in certain cases. For instance, if you’re applying for an educator credential issued by a state education department, one of the documents you will be required to submit is an IHSC report. What exactly is an IHSC report and how do you request the FBI for it? We take a look at the process in this piece.

To begin with, it is the U.S. Department of Justice Order 556-73, also known as Departmental Order, that establishes rules and regulations for you to obtain a copy of your Identity History Summary for review, or proof that one does not exist. That order was passed on Sept. 24, 1973, resulting from a determination that “28 U.S.C. 534 does not prohibit the subjects of arrest and convictions records from having access to those records.” The order directed the FBI to release to the subjects of identification records copies of such records upon submission of a written request, satisfactory proof of identity of the person whose identification record is requested, and a processing fee.

What exactly is in a “rap sheet,” the colloquial term for an FBI Identification Record or IHSC? According to the DOJ order we mentioned earlier, it is a listing of certain information taken from fingerprint submissions retained by the FBI in connection with arrests and, in some instances, includes information taken from fingerprints submitted in connection with federal employment, naturalization, or military service. The Identification Record includes the name of the agency or institution that submitted the fingerprints to the FBI. 

What happens if the fingerprint records concern a criminal offense? In that case, the Identification Record includes the date of arrest or the date the individual was received by the agency submitting the fingerprints, the arrest charge, and the disposition of the arrest if known to the FBI. All arrest data included in an Identification Record are obtained from fingerprint submissions, disposition reports, and other reports submitted by agencies having criminal justice responsibilities.

How Can You Get Your IHSC?

According to the FBI, there are three ways for anyone to request access to an IHSC (or for proof that one does not exist, of course):

  • Electronic — To submit an electronic request directly to the FBI for your IHSC, you can click here and then follow the steps listed by the Bureau under the “Obtaining Your Identity History Summary” section. If you choose this method, per the FBI, you may visit a participating U.S. Post Office location to submit your fingerprints electronically as part of your request. You may go to any of the participating U.S. Post Office locations nationwide upon completion of your request. Additional fees may apply.
    If you choose not to use a U.S. Post Office location to submit your fingerprints electronically, then you may still mail your completed fingerprint card, along with the confirmation email you received when you started your electronic request, to the address listed on the confirmation email. The request will continue to be processed as an electronic submission once the completed fingerprint card is received.
  • Mail — If you are considering mailing in your request, you first need to complete the Applicant Information Form. Next, you need to obtain a set of your fingerprints, which needs to be placed on a standard fingerprint form (FD-1164) commonly used for applicant or law enforcement purposes. For more information on the fingerprinting process requirements check the FBI website here, and for guidelines on recording legible prints from the Bureau, click here.
    Importantly, if you are submitting a request using this method, make sure you pay either by credit card using the Credit Card Payment Form, or get a money order or certified check for $18 made payable to the Treasury of the United States. Cash, personal checks, or business checks are not accepted, and sending any of these will delay processing of your request. Finally, you need to review the Identity History Summary Request Checklist to ensure you’ve included everything, and then mail the required items — signed applicant information form, fingerprint card, and the payment of $18 per person — to the following address:
    FBI CJIS Division – Summary Request
    1000 Custer Hollow Road
    Clarksburg, WV 26306
  • FBI-Approved Channeler — An FBI-Approved Channeler, per the Bureau’s website, is a private business that has contracted with the FBI to submit your request on your behalf. They receive the fingerprint submission and relevant data, collect the associated fee(s), electronically forward the fingerprint submission with the necessary information to the FBI for a national Identity History Summary check, and receive the electronic summary check result for dissemination to the individual. In other words, they help expedite the delivery of an IHSC report. The process for making the request is consistent with FBI submission procedures, but the approach may be different, and additional fees may apply over and above the FBI fee for processing the request. If you are using this way to get your IHSC, you will need to check with the specific Channeler you are planning to go with for costs, processing times, and availability in your area. For a list of FBI-Approved Channelers, click here.

Hollywood Hiring Practices, Gun Safety Precautions Under Scrutiny After Fatal Film Set Shooting

By Aara Ramesh

Just over a week after an accidental shooting on the set of the film “Rust” claimed the life of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, 42, and injured director Joel Souza, 48, Hollywood is undergoing something of a reckoning in regards to gun safety on sets and the hiring protocols for certain sensitive positions.

The shooting occurred shortly after lunch on Thursday, Oct. 21, outside Santa Fe, New Mexico. Producer-star Alec Baldwin was rehearsing a scene for the Western when he was handed a prop gun, which he was audibly assured was “cold” (i.e., unloaded). He was meant to point the gun at the camera, behind which several members of the crew were standing. When he set off the shot, a projectile hit Hutchins and went through her to hit Souza in the shoulder.

This incident — not the first of its kind in the industry’s history — has thrown up duelling narratives that are distinct and yet connected. On one hand, many are questioning the protocols governing gun safety on sets and whether, in the age of advanced visual effects and computer graphics, real guns are even needed on sets.

On the other hand, labor and hiring practices have been thrust into the limelight as well. Protesting working conditions, a number of the crew had walked off the set the day of the shooting, and a new replacement crew had been brought in. Little is known about the credentials of that non-union team and whether they were adequately trained on gun safety.

Two crew members have come under particular scrutiny. One is Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, 24, the armorer, i.e., the person on set who is in charge of any weapons. The other is assistant director Dave Halls.

Experienced armorers in the industry expressed surprise to news outlets that Gutierrez-Reed was given the top position after having only worked in such a role once before. In 2019, Halls was apparently fired from the set of “Freedom’s Path” after a crew member sustained a “minor and temporary injury when a gun was unexpectedly discharged.” He has, in the past, been the subject of multiple complaints regarding gun safety protocols, according to reports. It is not yet clear what the producers of “Rust” knew about his past before Halls was hired or what vetting process the crew was put through.

Gutierrez-Reed says she put the three prop guns on the cart, but Halls was the one to pick it up, declare it was “cold,” and pass it onto Baldwin. In the search warrant, Halls said he did not know it was loaded with live rounds. He also admitted that Gutierrez-Reed opened the firearm for his inspection, and that although he was supposed to check all the rounds before passing it onto Baldwin, he did not do so before saying it was safe. If Halls was indeed the last to handle the gun before Baldwin, one industry veteran says, that was in violation of rules and best practices.

Law enforcement announced Wednesday, Oct. 27, that they believe a real bullet was loaded into the revolver, though they did not disclose who did that. For her part, Gutierrez-Reed says that live ammunition was never kept on set and she has no idea where any live rounds found might have come from.

There are three types of guns used on sets, according to CNN. They are either completely fake models that look real but cannot fire; actual deactivated firearms; and real guns that are “loaded with blanks and mimic actual shooting, from flash to recoil.” Laws regulating gun and workplace safety on sets vary from state to state, if they even exist. In general, however, those that handle a real weapon on set follow a specific set of practices.

The order of who handles the weapon is carefully mapped out and is meant to be strictly adhered to. On the set of “Rust,” however, crew members say few of these protocols were followed. For one, both Halls and Gutierrez-Reed handed the weapons to the actors, when in actuality, only one was supposed to.

Further, reporting in recent days has revealed that gun inspections and other safety protocols were not followed on the set. Allegedly, the same gun that killed Hutchins was used earlier that day by some crew members to shoot at beer cans with live ammunition, as a way to pass time. Other sources within the crew said there were no safety meetings on set — something that is unusual for movies in which real guns are being used.

On Oct. 16, multiple sources said, Baldwin’s stunt double accidentally fired two live rounds after being told the gun was cold. This prompted one camera operator to submit a complaint. The Los Angeles Times said it viewed the message in question, which was sent to the unit production manager and which read: “We’ve now had 3 accidental discharges. This is super unsafe.”

Industry insiders and critics say that the “Rust” production appears to have been rushed and that producers were cutting corners on safety to save money, which is particularly alarming on any set where live weapons are being used. The Santa Fe County Sheriff even acknowledged that there was “some complacency” in gun safety on set. Allegedly, investigators found 500 rounds of ammunition that were a mix of blanks, dummy rounds, and suspected live rounds.

Production on the film has been halted until the investigation is complete, though the producers could still face civil lawsuits for months ahead. Meanwhile, Hollywood continues the debate over hiring practices and safety standards on sets. An Associated Press analysis concluded that in the three decades since 1991, at least 43 people have been killed on film sets in the U.S. and that over 150 were left with life-altering injuries.

Firearm Transfers And Permit Applications Decreased In 2018: BJS

By a Biometrica staffer

In 2018, there were around 1.6 million applications for firearm transfers and permits that were subject to background checks under the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (Brady Act). About 230,000 (1.4%) of these applications were denied, the Bureau of Justice Statistics said in a recent report. That’s a 11% decrease from 2016’s peak of 19.2 million applicants.

From the time that the Brady Act went into effect in 1994 to 2018, over 250 million applications were subject to background checks and nearly 3.8 million applications (1.5%) were denied. Findings in the report are based on the Firearm Inquiry Statistics (FIST) program, administered by the BJS. Felony convictions, indictments, or arrests accounted for nearly half (47%) of all denials in 2018.

The latest period for which the report has data available on is 2018. But data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has shown that 2020 was a record-setting year for firearm background checks. The Bureau conducted a record-high 40 million background checks on would-be gun buyers last year.

Meanwhile, there have been reports recently that the country’s gun violence epidemic is increasingly killing more American children and teenagers. Separately, the two most populous counties in the country — Los Angeles County, California, and Cook County, Illinois — are moving to tackle the problem of “ghost guns,” as law enforcement and the government continue to grapple with an ongoing rise in violent crime and homicides, more of which include a firearm than ever before. 

However, according to the BJS report, the number of applications for firearm transfers and permits have been on the decline since the 2016 peak. Per the FBI’s more recent data too, background checks for firearms appear to be cooling off this year after 2020’s record-setting pace.

The FBI processes all National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) checks for federal firearms licensees (FFLs) in 30 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories. It also processes NICS checks on only long gun applications for FFLs in seven states. As such, the FBI conducted NICS checks for 8.2 million applications for firearm transfers and permits in 2018, or almost half (49%) of all applications for the year. Of those applications, the FBI denied about 99,000 (1.4%).

State and local checking agencies conducted background checks for 8.5 million applications in 2018. State checking agencies received more than 7.2 million applications and denied about 97,000 (1.3%). Local checking agencies received over 1.3 million applications and denied about 34,000 (2.6%).

Of the 33 jurisdictions where state-level agencies did background checks or compiled local agency data on background checks, 13 conducted instant checks in 2018. These agencies received about 4.5 million applications for instant checks, the most common type of application, and denied 1.3% (61,000).

In 2018, state checking agencies in 16 states conducted background checks for exempt carry permits — the second-most common type of check they conducted. These agencies reported about 1.2 million applications for exempt carry permits and a denial rate of 1.1% (14,000 denied).

Felony convictions prompted about 45% of denials by the FBI, 21% by state checking agencies, and 15% by local checking agencies. The second-most common reason for denial was state law prohibitions (12%). These prohibitions accounted for about 17% of denials by both state and local agencies and 7.5% of denials by the FBI.

Drug use or addiction accounted for 11% of denials overall. A misdemeanor conviction for domestic violence was the reason given for about 7% of denials, and a protection or restraining order accounted for about 4%. About 6% of denials were for mental health commitments or adjudications.

FIST collects information on firearm applications, denials, and reasons for denial from state and local checking agencies and then combines it with data from the FBI’s NICS Section. FIST also collects data on denials that the FBI referred to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ (ATF) Denial Enforcement and NICS Intelligence (DENI) Branch for investigation and possible prosecution.

The 2003 PROTECT Act And Safeguarding Children From Sexual Exploitation

By Aara Ramesh

On Wednesday, Oct. 27, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that a Virginia man, 26-year-old Zackary Ellis Sanders, had been convicted by a federal jury for producing, receiving, and possessing child sexual abuse material (CSAM). The DOJ alleges that Sanders had “engaged in sexual conversations over multiple mobile messaging platforms with at least six different minors.” He was also found to have in his possession further images and videos of the sexual abuse of other children, which he supposedly obtained from the Darkweb. Sanders will be sentenced on March 4 next year, and faces a minimum sentence of 15 years in prison for his crimes.

Unfortunately, Sanders’ case is just one among millions worldwide. Last week, we wrote about the growth in sentencing in the U.S. for those producing CSAM. Between 2005 and 2019, there was a 422% spike in the number of CSAM production offenders sentenced, rising to 512 from 98. The Cyber Tipline of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) said that in 2020 it received 21.7 million reports of child sexual abuse imagery, online child exploitation and enticement, child sexual molestation, and child sex trafficking.

Though this problem has undoubtedly worsened since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, it is not directly attributable to the virus. As one source puts it, “[A]dults have been sexually exploiting children since the dawn of time under the guise of art in paintings, sketches, and other forms of portrayal.” With the invention of the camera in the 19th century, the category of CSAM exploded, though it tended to remain in individual possession, and was rarely published.

It was only with the advent of technology and the internet that the proliferation of CSAM grew out of control. Today, “there is virtually no commercial child pornography sold or produced” in the U.S., i.e., not sold legitimately. Rather, the production, trade, and exchange of such material is criminal and usually happens between private individuals via the internet. 

In today’s piece, we take a look at a landmark piece of legislation enacted in April 2003 to protect children from being sexually exploited — the Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to End the Exploitation of Children Today (PROTECT) Act.

Just a reminder: While the legal term for such material is “child pornography,” there is a growing movement to change the name of this category to “child sexual abuse material” because, by virtue of their age, children cannot consent to being part of any pornographic material. As a result, at Biometrica we use the term CSAM.

The first piece of legislation enacted by Congress to thwart the rising tide of CSAM was the Protection of Children Against Sexual Exploitation Act of 1977. It was followed by several other laws in 1984, 1986, 1990, 1996, and 1998, each aiming to close loopholes in the previous iterations that criminals had found to exploit.

Then, in 2003, the PROTECT Act was enacted. The law was crafted, as the DOJ says, to “comprehensively [strengthen] law enforcement’s ability to prevent, investigate, prosecute and punish violent crimes committed against children.” The best way to do this, it was determined, was through coordinated information sharing, fast response times, and sufficiently deterrent punishments.

In looking at violent crimes, officials identified three key problem areas that they hoped the law would address:

  • Law enforcement did not have the tools needed to locate missing children
  • They also did not have the tools necessary to effectively prosecute offenders and federal law did not ensure “adequate or consistent punishment” for such crimes
  • Some legal obstacles have made it difficult to prosecute cases involving child sexual abuse material (CSAM)

As such, the PROTECT Act provided solutions to each of these problems.

The first, and arguably most crucial, was establishing the AMBER Alert Program (AMBER standing for “America’s Missing: Broadcast Emergency Response”). The practice unofficially began in 1996 when 9-year-old Amber Hagerman was kidnapped in Arlington, Texas, while riding her bike and was later found brutally murdered. Dallas-Fort Worth broadcasters teamed up with local law enforcement to develop “an early warning system to help find abducted children.”

It wasn’t until the PROTECT Act, however, that the program was officially codified through the hiring of a dedicated National AMBER Alert Coordinator within the DOJ. Today, the system sends out an urgent bulletin with the support of broadcasters, transportation agencies, law enforcement agencies, and the wireless industry in the gravest child abduction cases.

As of April this year, there were 86 AMBER Plans throughout the U.S. By all measures, the AMBER Alert Program has proven to be quite successful. As per the DOJ, as of July 5, 2021, 1,074 children have been rescued specifically because of the program. In addition, 94 children have been rescued because of Wireless Emergency Alerts. 

As part of the solution, the PROTECT Act also modified some existing legal tools for application in the context of sexual crimes being committed against children, including in laws related to wiretaps; the statute of limitations on the abduction, physical abuse, or sexual abuse of a child; and bail terms for crimes against children.

The second problem area mentioned above was addressed through the establishment of new and more severe penalties for those seeking to harm children. For instance, the minimum prison sentence for a non-family member who abducts a child was raised to 20 years in the PROTECT Act. Similarly, it established a 15–30 year sentence for the first offense of using a child to produce CSAM.

It also established a “two strikes” provision mandating life imprisonment for anyone who is convicted for two serious child sexual abuse offenses. Another gap the law sought to rectify addressed the unusually high rates of recividism in child sexual abuse offenders, by removing the previous five-year cap on post-release supervision of such offenders.

Prior to the PROTECT Act, sentencing in child abuse cases were subject to high rates of “downward departures,” the DOJ says. Ranging from 25–29% nationwide in CSAM possession cases, this term refers to when a judge uses their own discretion to impose lower prison sentences than what the Sentencing Guidelines suggest. Reasons that judges have cited for these reduced sentences include “diminished capacity,” aberrant behavior,” and “family and community ties.”

The third problem area concerns laws against CSAM possession and distribution that are deemed unconstitutional. In particular, the DOJ refers to a specific decision by the Supreme Court that said it was unconstitutional to criminalize the possession of “virtual” CSAM, i.e., CSAM that does not involve real children.

That decision, the DOJ says, made it “immeasurably more difficult” to fight the proliferation of CSAM involving real children. Part of this is because the trafficking of most CSAM today involves digital files, meaning that defendants in such cases can use the Supreme Court’s ruling to sow reasonable doubt as to whether the digital CSAM material involves a real child or not.

Even in 2003, the DOJ said that problem was only likely to worsen as “computer imaging advances.” This may have proved to be truly prescient, as today the tech world grapples with the implications and potential uses of “deepfake” technology, which can be used to transpose the faces of children onto explicit sexual material.

As a result, the PROTECT Act revises and strengthens laws on virtual CSAM, deems illegal any sexually explicit or obscene materials that depict children, and enhances the punishments for those engaging with obscene material involving children, among other measures.

Another clause in the PROTECT Act goes after U.S. citizens or permanent residents who go abroad to sexually exploit a minor. Regardless of whether sex work is legal in any country, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says that human trafficking, having sex with a minor, and engaging with CSAM are always illegal, and anyone who engaged with these activities in a foreign country can legally be prosecuted in the U.S. after they return. The maximum penalty for such crimes is 30 years in prison.

The CDC says that at least 8,000 Americans have been arrested since the enacting of the PROTECT Act for such crimes. Just yesterday, Oct. 27, the DOJ announced that a man who had multiple prior convictions for offenses against minors was sentenced to 108 months in prison for attempting to sexually molest an 11-year-old boy in Vietnam, where he had lived between March 2003 and his arrest in January 2016.

Overall, even though CSAM convictions and sentences represent only a small minority of all the crimes committed in the U.S. on a daily basis, the problem is more widespread than those numbers would indicate. As the problem mutates and expands, the criminal justice system is also adapting so as to better catch those who would seek to harm society’s most vulnerable.

Surface Transport & Terror Threats: An Overview

By Deepti Govind

Transportation is known to be a “coveted” target among terror actors worldwide, even though certain modes have become increasingly — and thankfully — extremely hard targets to crack. Aviation, of course, is the first mode of transport that comes to mind when we think about terror threats. However, it’s also the industry that has taken the most stringent security measures, especially since the 9/11 attacks, and has consequently become the toughest target. But the amount of public and media attention over terror threats to aviation has, perhaps, somewhat overshadowed the very real threat to surface transportation, which has also come under attack by terrorists across the world.

For instance, on March 11, 2004, 10 bombs on four commuter trains at three stations in Spain’s Madrid killed 193 people and wounded more than 1,800. Two days later, terror group Al Qaeda claimed responsibility for the carnage. Cut to July 11 2006: Seven blasts ripped through suburban trains in India’s western city of Mumbai during the evening rush hour, killing 189 people and injuring more than 800. Mumbai’s suburban train system is one of the busiest in the world and, in 2015, a BBC report said it ferried over eight million commuters a day.

To be sure, terrorist attacks on passenger rail are statistically rare events in economically advanced countries, according to a paper published by the Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) and San Jose State University in June 2020. But the interest from terror actors over transportation as a target remains, and that includes surface transport, of which, in turn, rail appears to be the preferred target. An MTI article from 2016 said attacks on surface transportation by terror actors had increased worldwide.

When the MTI article was published, its internal database showed that between 1970 and the end of 2015, only about 11% of attacks on surface transportation in the world occurred in Western Europe, Canada, and the United States. Worldwide, though, attacks with 25 or more fatalities on buses, trains, and passenger ferries grew from only four between 1975 and 1985 to 39 between 2005 and 2015, the MTI article added. Still, the threat has not entirely disappeared. In March 2020, for instance, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) implemented a new rule that requires rail employees in higher-risk freight rail operations be trained to watch for terrorist-related threats.

In this piece, we explore why surface transportation has been a terror target, and how terror groups view it while planning their attacks. In future pieces, we will explore whether the attacks are sophisticated in nature or if the reason behind their proliferation is that they’re relatively “easier” to carry out, and what authorities are doing to combat these threats in the United States.

Why Surface Transportation, And How?

There could be several reasons why terror actors may choose to target surface transportation — whether trains, metros, subways, buses, or even trucks and other freight carriers. One, per the MTI, is that public surface transportation “offer terrorists easy access and crowds of people, making them especially attractive to terrorists seeking high body counts.” The fact that aviation has become a tough target to attack could also be playing a role in terror actors turning their view towards surface transportation instead.

Then there is the fact that terror actors need not use really sophisticated methods to carry out attacks on surface transportation. For instance, stabbings in public transport or vehicle rammings do not require as much planning, equipment, or coordination as carrying out an attack on an airplane or at an airport. Still, that doesn’t mean these attacks aren’t just as deadly. At the end of the day, lives are lost or people are injured no matter the level of planning and sophistication involved in carrying out terror attacks.

When it comes to surface transportation, often the weapons — a knife, a vehicle — could be more readily accessible. But there are efforts being taken to prevent these kinds of attacks, too. Last week, the U.S. House passed legislation designed to make it harder for terrorists to rent cars and trucks to use to carry out attacks. The bill was named after Darren Drake of New Milford, one of eight people killed in a 2017 terrorist attack in New York City when Sayfullo Saipov, an Uzbek national who gave a Paterson address to authorities, used a rented truck to mow down people on a Manhattan bike path.

Another factor that makes surface transportation relatively more “convenient” for terror attacks could be the immense challenges that come with protecting every stretch of it. For instance, according to an article in Homeland Security Today from March 2019, the Al Qaeda’s “Inspire” magazine itself spells out why the rail industry makes for an “attractive” target.

“America’s railroads are estimated to be a 1/3 of the world’s railway. So how can they protect 240,000 km of railroad … it is practically impossible. The same goes to Britain, with 18,500 km and France, with 29,473 km. It is a daunting and almost impossible task to protect the long railroad length, and yet one of the easiest to target,” Al Qaeda’s “Lone Jihad Guidance Team” wrote, per the Homeland Security Today article.

That issue of Al Qaeda’s magazine goes on to stress that carrying out attacks on train tracks would be preferable to attacking cars or train stations. Another reason behind that is that both Al Qaeda and Islamic State have been highlighting terror attack methods that eschew suicide and leave the jihadist alive to conduct another attack, the Homeland Security Today article added. Al Qaeda is particularly interested in America’s high-speed routes and in complex “dual operations.” A complex dual operation, per that article, would be terror actors attacking a train hauling hazardous materials through a well-populated area.

These magazines even come with step-by-step instructions that show jihadists how to make a “derailment tool” to clamp onto a track composed of concrete, rebar, sheet metal and rubber. Luckily, a Department of Homeland Security official told Homeland Security Today that the tool was assessed as not strong enough to be able to take a train off the tracks. Even so, there have been attempts by terror actors based on the instructions circulated in these magazines.

In 2017, Akayed Ullah set off a pipe bomb during rush hour in the Times Square subway station. That has been called an “ISIS-inspired bombing” and Ullah used Christmas tree light fragments to ignite the explosion. He later claimed he had only wanted to kill himself and was not acting on behalf of the Islamic State group, per a BBC article. There were no deaths in the bombing, but four people were injured. The explosion also forced the closure of the station as well as the busy Port Authority Bus Terminal.

As the global effort to combat terror activities continues to strengthen, and intelligence-sharing between law enforcement agencies and nations continues, terror actors may continue to be “forced” to resort to relatively easier attacks that can be carried out with more readily accessible weapons, such as truck rammings, stabbings on various modes of transport, mass shootings at transport stations, and so on. However, like aviation, it’s only a matter of time before security methods continue to advance across surface transportation modes too, making those harder targets as well.

This is the first piece in a mini series that Biometrica will be exploring on terror threats to surface transportation.

DOJ-Led Operation Collars 150 Darknet Drug Traffickers Worldwide

By a Biometrica staffer

On Tuesday, Oct. 26, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the results of a massive ten-month, multinational, multi-agency operation (called “Dark HunTor”), which included over 150 arrests across the world and the seizure of 45 weapons, 234 kgs of drugs, and over $31 million in cash and virtual currencies. Around 65 of the arrests were carried out in the U.S., and the DOJ says that a number of connected investigations are still ongoing. Prosecutions in this case will take place in over 15 federal districts. 

The operation, which was run by the DOJ’s Joint Criminal Opioid and Darknet Enforcement (JCODE) spanned the U.S., Europe, and Australia, and was aimed at disrupting the illegal trafficking of opioids, an increasing amount of which are laced with deadly substances like fentanyl these days. The drugs seized included amphetamine, cocaine, opioids, MDMA, ecstasy, fentanyl, oxycodone, hydrocodone, and methamphetamine. They also found fake medicines.

The DOJ says that Operation Dark HunTor is the largest and most successful operation the JCODE has ever run. It is rooted in the takedown of the website DarkMarket by German authorities earlier this year, in January. At the time, DarkMarket was the largest illegal marketplace on the darkweb. During that process, officials seized the site’s infrastructure, which proved to be a treasure trove of evidence. With the help of Europol’s European Cybercrime Centre (EC3), the JCODE was able to put together information on the key drug buyers and vendors on the darknet, resulting in Operation Dark HunTor.

The term “Darknet” refers to that obscure part of the internet that doesn’t show up in conventional search engines and that must be accessed via special, untraceable browsers. The name of the operation is a play on words that refers to the Tor Browser, which is a famous, “specialized anonymity-providing” web browser. 

The shadowy, encrypted nature of these Darknet websites makes it difficult for law enforcement to monitor them, making them ideal for trafficking in illegal goods and services, ranging from human and sex trafficking and organ sales to illegal drugs and counterfeit medications.

In August, Biometrica wrote about how drug trafficking over the darknet grew nearly fourfold in recent years, particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic. Speaking at the press conference Tuesday, Deputy Attorney General Lisa O. Monaco pointed out that ​​“since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, more people have turned to the Darknet than ever before to buy drugs. Already a billion-dollar illicit drug industry, Darknet drug revenue has surpassed pre-pandemic levels.” 

On the operation, she added, “Operation Dark HunTor was launched with one clear goal: to hunt down the vendors, buyers, and suppliers who had been hiding on that site and make sure they did not find a new platform.” In the U.S. alone, per Deputy AG Monaco’s statement, authorities seized “over 200,000 pills, 90% of which were found to contain counterfeit opioids or narcotics.”

Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite Jr. of the Criminal Division also delivered a statement, in which he noted: “The online trafficking of opioids, particularly fentanyl, poses a lethal threat to not only the United States, but also to our European and Australian counterparts, and beyond. This is a global threat that requires a global response. […] It is clear to me that only through a ‘whole of government’ and, in this case, global approach to tackling cyber-enabled drug trafficking can we hope to achieve the significant results illustrated in today’s announcement. Consistent, coordinated and collaborative bilateral engagement efforts are the key to the success you see here today.”

The JCODE is led by the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) and pairs up federal law enforcement with their foreign counterparts and “supports, coordinates, and assists in de-confliction of investigations targeting for disruption and dismantlement of the online sale of illegal drugs, especially fentanyl and other opioids.” Last September, the initiative was behind Operation DisrupTor.

The JCODE spans a number of U.S. agencies, including the FBI, the DOJ’s Criminal Division, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) division, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS); the Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigation team, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS). 

Where Do Casinos Fit In The Fight Against Human Trafficking?

By Deepti Govind

Earlier this month, there were reports of a 12-state human trafficking, joint undercover sting, called Operation United Front, that led to the arrests of 102 people. Through the operation, 47 victims were rescued, including two minors. As part of Operation United Front, undercover officers would either arrange to meet with potential victims or pose as victims themselves in order to arrest buyers or traffickers. One of the anti-sex trafficking operations under this larger sting took place at a casino, where the undercover officers contacted and rescued two women. It’s a reminder that crimes can occur at any legitimate business, and that, often, criminals devise ways to ensure such activities go unnoticed by those who own or run the business.

In Nebraska, even before casinos were scheduled to open in the state after a vote to legalize them, a bill advanced by lawmakers in March sought to mandate the display of human trafficking informational posters at the soon-to-be-opened casinos. The state already mandates such posters at rest stops and strip clubs, both places that advocates have identified as spots where human trafficking might take place. There have been other recent examples of how casinos could unknowingly become part of the narrative in such cases.

For instance, in early October, a search-and-rescue nonprofit was combing through a wooded area in the eastern part of Florida’s Hillsborough County, in a community known as Keysville, for 21-year-old Kelly Vazquez, whose family has not seen her since May 23. Kelly had returned home to her grandmother’s house around 9 a.m. on May 23, saying she’d gone to a casino in Tampa the night before.

She picked up some clothes, said she’d be back in a few hours, and left again with a man she was dating, her grandmother Maria Vazquez said. A friend who had seen Kelly in the afternoon on the same day said Kelly mentioned that she may visit the casino again. Kelly’s grandmother said they’ve heard of all kinds of stories as a possible cause — from overdose to trafficking. But for the moment, detectives say it’s all hearsay. Per one report, though, three women of color (including Kelly) went missing around the same area, around the same time and each case has similar, yet peculiar, details.

But why does the human trafficking system target casinos as venues for their illicit activities?

First, though, what exactly is the definition of human trafficking? As we mentioned in our earlier piece on the non-profit Truckers Against Trafficking (TAT), it is widely considered to be a form of slavery, where people — mostly but not exclusively young girls and women — are traded like commodities for various purposes like manual labor, “working” as household servants, or being forced into commercial sex work. Per the International Labor Organisation, the “industry” makes around $150 billion a year for criminals, and it is estimated that there are more than 40 million people worldwide who are victims of human trafficking.

Human trafficking occurs throughout the United States. In 2015, the National Human Trafficking Resource Center, a non-governmental organization that operates a hotline to receive reports or provide information about human trafficking, received multiple reports concerning human trafficking in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, according to a 2017 report published by the Department of Justice. In that report, the DOJ adds that “pimps often target children at bus stops and train stations, schools, strip clubs, casinos, group homes, truck stops, and through social networking and escort websites.”

Human Trafficking In The Legitimate Travel Industry

According to the Colorado-based TAT, there have been instances where sex trafficking survivors reported that casinos were used as a meeting place for buyers, some of whom were solicited online, or as a venue to solicit prospective buyers. But, on the other hand, casinos can also become a refuge for victims and offer them a secure location from where they can seek help or try and escape their situation. It’s this intersection of the two that uniquely positions casinos, like it does truckers, as another crucial aspect of the fight against human trafficking.

To begin with a simple example, drivers of buses that carry patrons to and from casinos could — again, like truck drivers — come into contact with trafficking victims who are being transported. Or these victims may be trying to use these buses as a way to run away from their situations. In the next part of this piece, we will further explore how human trafficking can occur at legitimate casinos without anyone’s knowledge.

Globally, not just in the U.S., the travel industry is an unknowing conduit for human trafficking, says a training document for front-line staff published by MPI (Meeting Professionals International), a meeting and event thought-leader. Traffickers are known to exploit legitimate businesses to their advantage.

When it comes to hotels and casinos, traffickers also tend to use them as venues since buyers most likely already have a room there. And traffickers are always looking to cut costs. When operating at a casino or hotel-casino, the traffickers may be with their victims, or on the premises, or may send their victims to the casinos to find buyers on their own, the TAT guidelines for casinos and bus operators (Busing on the Lookout) says.

If they are on the premises, while their victims are working, traffickers may go to a hang-out area and entertain themselves with drinks and play games. Even when victims are on the premises without their trafficker, there may be a strong trauma-bond (powerful emotional attachments that occur as a result of cycles of abuse), which makes it more likely that victims will stick to a scripted story, refuse to cooperate, or claim they are there by “choice,” the TAT guideline adds.

Sex trafficking in casinos tends to have its own set of rules that the traffickers and victims will follow based, in part, on the operations and culture of the casino itself, the TAT toolkit says. Given that, there tend to be two categories of victims: those who are new to being trafficked at casinos and may have a harder time approaching buyers and are, consequently, easier to spot; and those who already have experience at casinos and are more likely to know the casino floor plan, work hours of staff members, etc.

Per the MPI document, if a trafficker plans to use a casino as a meeting venue, the individual will learn the hours and operations of the casinos, as well as the schedules of the head of security and pit bosses. In contrast, the same traffickers will want to avoid businesses whose staff have the reputation of being trained to recognize human trafficking and are willing to report it to law enforcement. That’s where the role of casinos in fighting human trafficking really starts, with training employees on identifying and reporting it.

Buyers of commercial sex work at casinos, too, tend to fall into two main categories, per the TAT report. There are the repeat buyers who have been to casinos to purchase prostituted people before and have returned with the intention of purchasing sex again. And then there are the new or “opportunistic” buyers, who have either not purchased sex before or who did not come to the casino with a plan or the intention of purchasing sex. Warning signs and posters are said to be an effective deterrent for opportunistic buyers.

At hotels and casinos, it’s the busier seasons that tend to both increase patronage to the casinos and the illicit demand for purchasing sex at them. According to TAT, studies have also found a correlation between major events and increases in sex trafficking, because of increases in demand for commercial sex during those events, especially for those in which there are large numbers of men visiting from out of town. These spikes occur during sports events, concerts or music festivals, trade shows, and conferences.

There is no standard outfit of choice to identify victims of human trafficking at casinos. They will be dressed based on what they think will appeal to buyers in that location, but will also try not to dress in a way that stands out as inappropriate for the season or their age. There have even been some instances where rogue casino or hotel staff have been reported as acting as middlemen in setting up prostituted people with buyers. This is where background screenings of employees plays a crucial role.

“When I was being trafficked, people assumed I was a prostitute. My trafficking was hidden in plain sight, in the middle of casinos on the
Las Vegas strip around thousands of people a day […]. My life was in danger if I didn’t make money for my trafficker. Everyone thought they knew what I was, so no one asked; but if someone stopped to talk to me maybe they would have found out what was happening to me,” survivor-leader Annika Huff says in the TAT toolkit, which she created.

In the next part of this mini series, we will explore the various red flags that casinos can look for to identify possible human trafficking at their venues, and what they can do in those circumstances.

Anyone wanting to report potential trafficking or victims in need of help can call 911 for emergencies or the National Human Trafficking Hotline at 888-373-7888.

In addition, Truckers Against Trafficking can be contacted for help or getting certified at 612-888-2050.

FBI Updates 2020 Hate Crime Statistics After Minor Technical Error

By a Biometrica staffer

Due to a small technical issue that omitted part of the data submission from the state of Ohio, the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) has updated and re-released its statistics on hate crimes and bias-motivated incidents in 2020. The original report was issued a few months ago, in August.

The FBI’s hate crime data is voluntarily submitted by local law enforcement agencies, and covers criminal incidents and offenses motivated by bias against a specific race, ethnicity, ancestry, religion, sexual orientation, disability, gender, and gender identity. A total of 15,138 agencies sent the FBI statistics in 2020. There are roughly 18,000 law enforcement agencies nationwide, so this represents a participation rate of approximately 84%.

In the original report, the FBI said there were 7,759 hate crime incidents reported in total, representing a 6.1% increase over 2019. It was also the highest number of incidents recorded since 2008, when there were a total of 7,783 incidents reported, and was the second year in a row that record was broken.

The newly released statistics revise that number, with 8,263 criminal incidents being submitted by law enforcement agencies. However, this increase makes 2020 the record-holder for most number of hate crime incidents noted since 2001 and the aftermath of 9/11, when the FBI received 9,730 reports of hate crime incidents.

The total number of hate-related offenses was at 11,129 in 2020, the latest report from the FBI says. Adding in Ohio’s data increased the number of victims to 11,126 from the 10,528 reported in August. 

The biggest change in the offenders’ motivations came in the disability category, but even those were minimal. The updated report says 20% of victims were attacked due to the offender’s sexual orientation bias (compared to the earlier 20.5%), and 1.4% were victimized due to the offender’s disability bias (compared to the previous 1%).

As we wrote in August, the Black and Asian-American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities saw the sharpest rise in the number of hate crime incidents targeting them in 2020. In particular and tied to the Covid-19 pandemic, bias-motivated incidents against AAPI people spiked 76% in 2020, compared to 2020. Hate incidents against Black people rose around 40%, but by pure numbers, Black people still are most often the targets of hate crime incidents.

An additional two rapes were reported as hate crimes, the FBI says — 21 in total during 2020, instead of the earlier 19. In what is considered the “victimless crime” category of crimes against society (i.e., engaging in prostitution, drug violations, illegal gambling, etc.), there were actually 232 offenses last year, and not 193, as previously mentioned.

While the number of “known offenders” saw a modest adjustment (6,780 instead of 6,431), the demographics of these perpetrators was largely unchanged. The same is true for the locations where the hate crime incident took place, with most happening at or near a place of residence/home, and around 20% on highways, roads, alleys, streets, or sidewalks. As in the earlier version of the report, just over 3% occurred at places of worship, like churches, synagogues, temples, or mosques.